<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: These Photoshop Plug-In&#8217;s ROC and SHO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.planetphotoshop.com/these-photoshop-plug-ins-roc-and-sho.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.planetphotoshop.com/these-photoshop-plug-ins-roc-and-sho.html</link>
	<description>Online Photoshop Tutorials, News and Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:09:49 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: elwoode</title>
		<link>http://www.planetphotoshop.com/these-photoshop-plug-ins-roc-and-sho.html/comment-page-1#comment-1615</link>
		<dc:creator>elwoode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 18:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetphotoshop.com/beta/?p=293#comment-1615</guid>
		<description>about the digatal SHO plugin, what is so good about it - I mean why is it better than the shaddow highlight feature that comes with CS3 ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>about the digatal SHO plugin, what is so good about it &#8211; I mean why is it better than the shaddow highlight feature that comes with CS3 ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
