<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So What Do You Think?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.planetphotoshop.com/so-what-do-you-think.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.planetphotoshop.com/so-what-do-you-think.html</link>
	<description>Online Photoshop Tutorials, News and Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:00:44 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Milt Anglin</title>
		<link>http://www.planetphotoshop.com/so-what-do-you-think.html/comment-page-1#comment-2639</link>
		<dc:creator>Milt Anglin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetphotoshop.com/?p=1303#comment-2639</guid>
		<description>I really don&#039;t see any WOW factor in CS4 however Bridge and Camera Raw look good. The improvement in Dodge and Burn might prove helpful in photo restoration which is my primary interest. I will do the upgrade primarily for Bridge and ACR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t see any WOW factor in CS4 however Bridge and Camera Raw look good. The improvement in Dodge and Burn might prove helpful in photo restoration which is my primary interest. I will do the upgrade primarily for Bridge and ACR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorge S</title>
		<link>http://www.planetphotoshop.com/so-what-do-you-think.html/comment-page-1#comment-2609</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorge S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 22:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetphotoshop.com/?p=1303#comment-2609</guid>
		<description>I really like the content aware scaling tool
i think its pretty amazing and may become useful often
and what&#039;s this MP3 thing Martin was talking about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like the content aware scaling tool<br />
i think its pretty amazing and may become useful often<br />
and what&#8217;s this MP3 thing Martin was talking about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.planetphotoshop.com/so-what-do-you-think.html/comment-page-1#comment-2602</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 15:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetphotoshop.com/?p=1303#comment-2602</guid>
		<description>I agree with Reeves as well. I didn&#039;t see anything that made me say &quot;wow, I better upgrade to CS4...and fast.&quot; I saw some neat things (3D and rotation tool) but I don&#039;t think not having them will affect me in the least. At least with the rotation tool, the work around in CS3 is extremely simple and fast if you&#039;ve done it a few times.

I&#039;ll wait until CS5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Reeves as well. I didn&#8217;t see anything that made me say &#8220;wow, I better upgrade to CS4&#8230;and fast.&#8221; I saw some neat things (3D and rotation tool) but I don&#8217;t think not having them will affect me in the least. At least with the rotation tool, the work around in CS3 is extremely simple and fast if you&#8217;ve done it a few times.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll wait until CS5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.planetphotoshop.com/so-what-do-you-think.html/comment-page-1#comment-2597</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetphotoshop.com/?p=1303#comment-2597</guid>
		<description>&quot;... Please keep providing tutorials that work with older versions ...&quot;

Yes, that would be nice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230; Please keep providing tutorials that work with older versions &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, that would be nice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.planetphotoshop.com/so-what-do-you-think.html/comment-page-1#comment-2593</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 05:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetphotoshop.com/?p=1303#comment-2593</guid>
		<description>I agree with Michael Reeves, especially the request to you guys to keep providing tutorials for older versions. Well for at least CS3 (if not CS2)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Michael Reeves, especially the request to you guys to keep providing tutorials for older versions. Well for at least CS3 (if not CS2)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Reeves</title>
		<link>http://www.planetphotoshop.com/so-what-do-you-think.html/comment-page-1#comment-2586</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Reeves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 20:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetphotoshop.com/?p=1303#comment-2586</guid>
		<description>Well as for me, I&#039;m going to stay with CS3.  I know that there&#039;s always a lot of hype with the release of a NEW version, but I&#039;m not seeing anything I can&#039;t live without.  I gotta admit, there are some interesting looking toys, but nothing crucial.

With an 18 month development schedule, I can&#039;t afford to keep trying to stay current every time, given the cost of the Suite.  I&#039;ll hold out for CS5.  What&#039;s another 18 months?

Please keep providing tutorials that work with older versions, cause I really find them useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well as for me, I&#8217;m going to stay with CS3.  I know that there&#8217;s always a lot of hype with the release of a NEW version, but I&#8217;m not seeing anything I can&#8217;t live without.  I gotta admit, there are some interesting looking toys, but nothing crucial.</p>
<p>With an 18 month development schedule, I can&#8217;t afford to keep trying to stay current every time, given the cost of the Suite.  I&#8217;ll hold out for CS5.  What&#8217;s another 18 months?</p>
<p>Please keep providing tutorials that work with older versions, cause I really find them useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.planetphotoshop.com/so-what-do-you-think.html/comment-page-1#comment-2585</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 20:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetphotoshop.com/?p=1303#comment-2585</guid>
		<description>I think Photoshop has nothing to do with 3D. There are much better tools for this! I also don&#039;t want to listen my mp3 with Photoshop!
Other features like the rotation of the canvas (I&#039;m a WACOM user) and the adjustment panel are great.
I also like the feature of adjusting the size of the brush in a faster way(as shown at Photoshop World - I think). By the way, this is the way Maya do it for a long time.
But all at all, the best would be the GPU support. So you can work way faster - I hope!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Photoshop has nothing to do with 3D. There are much better tools for this! I also don&#8217;t want to listen my mp3 with Photoshop!<br />
Other features like the rotation of the canvas (I&#8217;m a WACOM user) and the adjustment panel are great.<br />
I also like the feature of adjusting the size of the brush in a faster way(as shown at Photoshop World &#8211; I think). By the way, this is the way Maya do it for a long time.<br />
But all at all, the best would be the GPU support. So you can work way faster &#8211; I hope!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
